Reviews

2.9
Based on 4 reviews and 36 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
ZAR 29
First month. Then ZAR 69 / month
1 year
ZAR 299
Best valueFirst year. Then ZAR 499 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Other
Oct 9, 2024

Ex pecanwood parent

Total scam… don’t waste your money, level of education is pathetic, staff not suitably qualified.
Other
Sep 21, 2023

Don’t waste your money

The school is so depressing
Parent
Apr 5, 2020

Pecanwood College ,our village

Pecan wood college has been my daughters school for the past 2 years. I am blown away at how amazing this school is. The teachers are amazing and the way the kids are taught through play is amazing too. They think outside the box and include parents in everything. They teach our children to be good caring people. It is a community. They say it takes a village to raise a child, well we have pecan wood college to help. Amazing.
Parent
Apr 5, 2020

Best school

My daughter goes to the school and I can honestly say it has the most kind a caring staff. My daughter has never complained about anything at the school, she loves going to school. The staff always have time for the parents and really do go the extra mile.

We couldn’t have picked a better school!
Oberon Drive & R512 Broederstroom, 216, Broederstroom
27 12 001 7118

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines