Reviews

3.7
Based on 1 reviews and 9 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
ZAR 29
First month. Then ZAR 69 / month
1 year
ZAR 299
Best valueFirst year. Then ZAR 499 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Former Student
May 30, 2020

Ohhhh

Kayamandi high school is a great school with great diversity among teachers and students from different cultures. Academic excellence is one the first priorities and teachers are dedicated to feed students with quality education, however, Kayamandi high does not make enough effort to motivate all their students, instead focus more on science students i.e. Mathematics and physical science as it is considered science school. Students who don't like or don't do physical science aren't permitted to do Mathematics although there are qualifications that require maths but not physics and in Kayamandi high school students are denied to do Mathematics if they are not gonna do physics. Other students such as hospitality students aren't taken as serious as science students. To conclude, Kayamandi is indeed a great school and is one of the most schools with students passing with high quality rates, However it must also learn to pay attention to struggling students as they are also willing to learn.
94 School Cres Kayamandi, 7615, Stellenbosch
218895481

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines